On 06/13/2013 02:10 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
The point of the patch is to fix the base function and then offer access
to the function as a gcc extension. boost has these functions. These
have been offered in C++ library papers extending TR 29123.
If Boost already has those extensions and are well known (did you say
that?) and are kept uglified for the time being, then fine, let's fix
them essentially as you did in your patch.
If we really have to add a testcase - I'm not sure - please double check
that it passes testing with -Wall, no unused vars.
Thanks,
Paolo.
