Please see updated patch.

Is it ok to install?

Thanks,
Igor

Changelog:

2013-06-11  Igor Zamyatin  <igor.zamya...@intel.com>

        * doc/invoke.texi (core-avx2): Document.
        (slm): Likewise.
        (atom): Updated with MOVBE.


diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index b7b32f7..dd82880 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -13833,10 +13833,19 @@ Intel Core CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX,
SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
 SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AES, PCLMUL, FSGSBASE, RDRND and F16C instruction
 set support.

+@item core-avx2
+Intel Core CPU with 64-bit extensions, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3,
+SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AES, PCLMUL, FSGSBASE, RDRND, FMA, BMI, BMI2
+and F16C instruction set support.
+
 @item atom
-Intel Atom CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3
+Intel Atom CPU with 64-bit extensions, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3
 instruction set support.

+@item slm
+Intel Silvermont CPU with 64-bit extensions, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2,
SSE3, SSSE3,
+SSE4.1 and SSE4.2 instruction set support.
+
 @item k6
 AMD K6 CPU with MMX instruction set support.


On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:25:36PM +0400, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
>> Following patch documents Intel Silvermont support.
>>
>> OK to install?
>>
>> 2013-06-10  Igor Zamyatin  <igor.zamya...@intel.com>
>>
>>         * doc/invoke.texi: Document slm.
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> index b7b32f7..e4f1d45 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> @@ -13837,6 +13837,10 @@ set support.
>>  Intel Atom CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3
>>  instruction set support.
>>
>> +@item slm
>> +Intel Silvermont CPU with 64-bit extensions, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 and SSSE3,
>> +SSE4.1, SSE4.2 instruction set support.
>
> Shouldn't it also list MOVBE (similarly for atom and core-avx2, btver2
> already lists it).
>
> core-avx2 isn't even documented at all in invoke.texi.
>
>         Jakub

Reply via email to