On 6/10/13, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote:
> On 2013-06-09 20:34 , Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > So, my advice is for GCC source code to forget about the <cxxx>
> > headers for the most part.  I can see an instance where <cmath>
> > or <cstring> would make a difference but given point (1) above,
> > no it doesn't.  Just use the traditional <xxx.h> headers and
> > be done with it.
> >
> > Maybe I should have included this in our C++ coding standards,
> > but I don't know how Benjamin, Lawrence, and Diego fee about it.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me.

Me too.  The split in headers always felt excessively artifical
to me.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl

Reply via email to