On 06/03/2013 01:27 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
I am OK with Steve's changes in most cases. In a few cases, I am
using it as a parameter to pass into tests. On a top-level, the main
reason why I used argc, and argv is that, I want to make sure the
compiler will never do things like constant propagation, and it will
pass it as a variable.
So use Jakub's trick, or define non-inlinable functions which return
suitable tables.
We simply can't use argc/argv in the manner in which those tests do and
I'd rather clean up the test to avoid argc/argv than support two paths
through the test, one with argc/argv, one without.
jeff
