On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sut...@gmail.com> wrote: >> * Check against cxx11 dialect, not cxx0x. > > This check is actually all over parser.c, the reason it shows up in > the patch is that I reverted a previous change that affected some code > that included it. > > I'd feel better leaving it in, since its a change that could affect > some other part of the compiler.
Well, we don't want to check cxx0x one place and cxx11 others. Eventually, cxx0x will go away. So, it is better if we don't maintain vestiges in the code base. And with cxx1y coming in, I feel better if we don't have too many variables :-) -- Gaby
