On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:21:37AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> The dummy arguments names in a Fortran interface block are part of
> the interface as one can use "call proc(argname=value)" besides
> "call proc(value)"; thus, the dummy argument names are significant.
>
> The attached patch updates the names in the module file - and for
> completeness also in the documentation.
>
> OK for the trunk?
>
> Tobias
>
> PS: That the *_lock arguments are called "lock" in C/C++ but "svar"
> and "nvar" in Fortran is an odd inconsistency in the OpenMP spec.
Ok, thanks.
> 2013-05-27 Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de>
>
> PR fortran/57423
> * libgomp.texi (omp_set_dynamic, omp_set_nested, omp_set_nested,
> omp_set_num_threads, omp_init_lock, omp_set_lock, omp_test_lock,
> omp_unset_lock, omp_destroy_lock, omp_init_nest_lock,
> omp_set_nest_lock, omp_test_nest_lock, omp_unset_nest_lock,
> omp_destroy_nest_lock): Correct arguments to match the one in
> the OpenMP spec.
> * omp_lib.f90.in (omp_init_lock, omp_init_nest_lock, omp_destroy_lock
> omp_destroy_nest_lock, omp_set_lock, omp_set_nest_lock, omp_unset_lock,
> omp_unset_nest_lock, omp_set_dynamic, omp_set_nested,
> omp_set_num_threads, omp_test_lock, omp_test_nest_lock): Ditto.
Jakub
