*ping*
Alexander
2013/4/18 Patrick Marlier <patrick.marl...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I'm trying it on linux/x86_64 on trunk. Testing just by adding -fpic
>> to the dg-options:
>>
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47746.C
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47746.C
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> // { dg-do compile }
>> -// { dg-options "-fgnu-tm" }
>> +// { dg-options "-fgnu-tm -fpic" }
>>
>> Here is the error msg:
>>
>> testsuite/g++.dg/tm/pr47746.C:20:14: error: unsafe function call 'void
>> Building::load(InputStream*)' within 'transaction_safe' function
>
> Thanks! Now I understand the error (and I am able to reproduce it). :)
>
>> 4462| know what it will contain at runtime. */
>> 4463| if (cgraph_function_body_availability (node) < AVAIL_AVAILABLE)
>> 4464+> return true;
>> 4465|
>>
>> (gdb) p cgraph_function_body_availability (node)
>> $54 = AVAIL_OVERWRITABLE
>>
>> Sure I can file a PR If you think that the test was not supposed to
>> fail with -fpic
>
> I think your patch is OK but I cannot approve it since I am not a maintainer.
> I CCed Richard since he is the one who can approve and knows the TM
> implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Patrick
