Hi,

On 05/24/2013 03:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Why would we want to pedwarn? As far as I can tell, the standard doesn't say this is ill-formed. 9.6 says,

"The value of the integral constant expression may be larger than the number of bits in the object representation (3.9) of the bit-field’s type; in such cases the extra bits are used as padding bits and do not participate in the value representation (3.9) of the bit-field."

and

"A bool value can successfully be stored in a bit-field of any nonzero size."

I'm sure that lots of users would complain about the compiler starting to reject bool bitfields of 2-8 bits.
Thanks Jason. Shame on me, I was totally confused, I guess I need some time off (*).
I'm not opposed to warning about excessive size for bool and enum here, but the warning should be based on TYPE_SIZE rather than TYPE_PRECISION.
Makes perfect sense. Thus I'm finishing testing the below. Better?

Thanks again,
Paolo.

(*) For real, next week vacations for me.

////////////////////////
Index: cp/class.c
===================================================================
--- cp/class.c  (revision 199287)
+++ cp/class.c  (working copy)
@@ -3140,9 +3140,14 @@ check_bitfield_decl (tree field)
          error ("zero width for bit-field %q+D", field);
          w = error_mark_node;
        }
-      else if (compare_tree_int (w, TYPE_PRECISION (type)) > 0
-              && TREE_CODE (type) != ENUMERAL_TYPE
-              && TREE_CODE (type) != BOOLEAN_TYPE)
+      else if ((TREE_CODE (type) != ENUMERAL_TYPE
+               && TREE_CODE (type) != BOOLEAN_TYPE
+               && compare_tree_int (w, TYPE_PRECISION (type)) > 0)
+              || ((TREE_CODE (type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
+                   && (tree_int_cst_lt
+                       (TYPE_SIZE (ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE (type)), w)))
+                  || (TREE_CODE (type) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
+                      && tree_int_cst_lt (TYPE_SIZE (type), w))))
        warning (0, "width of %q+D exceeds its type", field);
       else if (TREE_CODE (type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
               && (0 > (compare_tree_int
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/expr/bitfield12.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/expr/bitfield12.C  (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/expr/bitfield12.C  (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// PR c++/19618
+
+struct bset1 {
+  bool bit : sizeof(bool) * __CHAR_BIT__ + 1;  // { dg-warning "exceeds" }
+};
+
+enum E {};
+
+struct bset2 {
+  E bit : sizeof(__underlying_type(E)) * __CHAR_BIT__ + 1; // { dg-warning 
"exceeds" }
+};
+
+struct bset3 {
+  bool bit : sizeof(bool) * __CHAR_BIT__;
+};
+
+struct bset4 {
+  E bit : sizeof(__underlying_type(E)) * __CHAR_BIT__;
+};

Reply via email to