On Thu, 23 May 2013, Mike Stump wrote: > This is a smaller patch than maybe it should be. Arguably not recursing > is a better approach, but then we need to split into two functions, so > that I can add the REFERENCE_TYPE back to the top. Let me know if you > prefer it split. > > A user actually hit this in rather trivial code with memory spaces. > > Tested on two platforms, one with memory spaces and one without. > > Ok?
This patch is OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com