Hello,

this is a minor patch, instead of manually building a NE_EXPR, it seems better to call the front-end function whose job it is. Incidentally, it means one expression is folded a little bit more, so I am re-enabling a test that I commented out this morning.

Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.

2013-05-16  Marc Glisse  <marc.gli...@inria.fr>

gcc/cp/
        * call.c (build_conditional_expr_1): Use cp_build_binary_op
        instead of directly calling fold_build2.

gcc/testsuite/
        * g++.dg/ext/vector22.C: Uncomment working test.

--
Marc Glisse
Index: cp/call.c
===================================================================
--- cp/call.c   (revision 198970)
+++ cp/call.c   (working copy)
@@ -4448,22 +4448,22 @@ build_conditional_expr_1 (tree arg1, tre
          || TYPE_SIZE (arg1_type) != TYPE_SIZE (arg2_type))
        {
          if (complain & tf_error)
            error ("incompatible vector types in conditional expression: "
                   "%qT, %qT and %qT", TREE_TYPE (arg1), TREE_TYPE (orig_arg2),
                   TREE_TYPE (orig_arg3));
          return error_mark_node;
        }
 
       if (!COMPARISON_CLASS_P (arg1))
-       arg1 = fold_build2 (NE_EXPR, signed_type_for (arg1_type), arg1,
-                      build_zero_cst (arg1_type));
+       arg1 = cp_build_binary_op (input_location, NE_EXPR, arg1,
+                                  build_zero_cst (arg1_type), complain);
       return fold_build3 (VEC_COND_EXPR, arg2_type, arg1, arg2, arg3);
     }
 
   /* [expr.cond]
 
      The first expression is implicitly converted to bool (clause
      _conv_).  */
   arg1 = perform_implicit_conversion_flags (boolean_type_node, arg1, complain,
                                            LOOKUP_NORMAL);
   if (error_operand_p (arg1))
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vector22.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vector22.C     (revision 198970)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/ext/vector22.C     (working copy)
@@ -4,19 +4,19 @@
 typedef unsigned vec __attribute__((vector_size(4*sizeof(int))));
 
 /* Disabled after PR57286
 void f(vec*a,vec*b){
   *a=(*a)?-1:(*b<10);
   *b=(*b)?(*a<10):0;
 }
 */
 void g(vec*a,vec*b){
   *a=(*a)?(*a<*a):-1;
-// *b=(*b)?-1:(*b<*b);
+  *b=(*b)?-1:(*b<*b);
 }
 void h(vec*a){
   *a=(~*a==5);
 }
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "~" "gimple" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "VEC_COND_EXPR" "gimple" } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "gimple" } } */

Reply via email to