On 04/30/2013 08:03 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm wondering if handling the additional TREE_CODE in finish_decltype_type isn't overall preferable (assuming we wouldn't end up soon handling all sorts of *_EXPR ;)
That's exactly the problem; it wouldn't stop with ADDR_EXPR, we would need to handle any form of expression that could be a template non-type argument.
Jason
