On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > I would really rather avoid introducing another macro to be removed again > later. Instead, let's use a value of __cplusplus greater than 201103L, > perhaps 201300? > > Jason
yes, that makes sense, and even a better path forward. Hopefully, the next committee draft will have that value. -- Gaby
