"Steve Ellcey " <sell...@imgtec.com> writes:
> 2013-04-19  Andrew Bennett <andrew.benn...@imgtec.com>
>           Steve Ellcey  <sell...@imgtec.com>
>
>       PR target/56942
>       * config/mips/mips.md (casesi_internal_mips16_<mode>): Use
>       next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn.

Hmm, I don't really like this.  Steven said from ARM in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Target bug, this is wrong:

  rtx diff_vec = PATTERN (next_real_insn (operands[2]));

A jump_table_data is not a real insn.  Before my patch this worked
by accident because the jump table would hide in a JUMP_INSN and 
next_real_insn returned any JUMP_P insn.

Use next_active_insn instead.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

But using next_real_insn was at least as correct (IMO, more correct)
as next_active_insn before r197266.  It seems counterintuitive that
something can be "active" but not "real".

Richard

Reply via email to