Hi Guys,

  I am checking in the patch below to make gcc generate the FPU-3.0
  multiply-add instructions when targeting the E3V5 V850 architecture.

Cheers
  Nick

gcc/ChangeLog
2013-04-03  Nick Clifton  <ni...@redhat.com>

        * config/v850/v850e3v5.md (fmasf4): Use fmaf.s on E3V5
        architectures.
        (fmssf4): Use fmsf.s on E3V5 architectures.
        (fnmasf4): Use fnmaf.s on E3V5 architectures.
        (fnmssf4): Use fnmsf.s on E3V5 architectures.

Index: gcc/config/v850/v850.md
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/v850/v850.md     (revision 197406)
+++ gcc/config/v850/v850.md     (working copy)
@@ -2508,14 +2508,18 @@
    (set_attr "cc" "none_0hit")
    (set_attr "type" "fpu")])
 
+;; Note: The FPU-2.0 (ie pre e3v5) versions of these routines do not actually
+;; need operand 4 to be the same as operand 0.  But the FPU-2.0 versions are
+;; also deprecated so the loss of flexibility is unimportant.
+
 ;;; multiply-add
 (define_insn "fmasf4"
   [(set (match_operand:SF         0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (fma:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand" "r")
                (match_operand:SF 2 "register_operand" "r")
-               (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "r")))]
+               (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "0")))]
   "TARGET_USE_FPU"
-  "maddf.s %2,%1,%3,%0"
+  { return TARGET_V850E3V5_UP ? "fmaf.s %1, %2, %0" : "maddf.s %2, %1, %3, 
%0"; }
   [(set_attr "length" "4")
    (set_attr "cc" "none_0hit")
    (set_attr "type" "fpu")])
@@ -2525,9 +2529,9 @@
   [(set (match_operand:SF                 0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (fma:SF (match_operand:SF         1 "register_operand" "r")
                (match_operand:SF         2 "register_operand" "r")
-               (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "r"))))]
+               (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "0"))))]
   "TARGET_USE_FPU"
-  "msubf.s %2,%1,%3,%0"
+  { return TARGET_V850E3V5_UP ? "fmsf.s %1, %2, %0" : "msubf.s %2, %1, %3, 
%0"; }
   [(set_attr "length" "4")
    (set_attr "cc" "none_0hit")
    (set_attr "type" "fpu")])
@@ -2537,21 +2541,21 @@
   [(set (match_operand:SF                 0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (neg:SF (fma:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand" "r")
                        (match_operand:SF 2 "register_operand" "r")
-                       (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "r"))))]
+                       (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "0"))))]
   "TARGET_USE_FPU"
-  "nmaddf.s %2,%1,%3,%0"
+  { return TARGET_V850E3V5_UP ? "fnmaf.s %1, %2, %0" : "nmaddf.s %2, %1, %3, 
%0"; }
   [(set_attr "length" "4")
    (set_attr "cc" "none_0hit")
    (set_attr "type" "fpu")])
 
 ;; negative-multiply-subtract
 (define_insn "fnmssf4"
-  [(set (match_operand:SF                 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+  [(set (match_operand:SF                         0 "register_operand" "=r")
        (neg:SF (fma:SF (match_operand:SF         1 "register_operand" "r")
                        (match_operand:SF         2 "register_operand" "r")
-                       (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "r")))))]
+                       (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 3 "register_operand" "0")))))]
   "TARGET_USE_FPU"
-  "nmsubf.s %2,%1,%3,%0"
+  { return TARGET_V850E3V5_UP ? "fnmsf.s %1, %2, %0" : "nmsubf.s %2, %1, %3, 
%0"; }
   [(set_attr "length" "4")
    (set_attr "cc" "none_0hit")
    (set_attr "type" "fpu")])

Reply via email to