Re: [C++ Patch/RFC] PR 55951

[Jason Merrill]

On 03/26/2013 11:00 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+      tree ce_index = cxx_constant_value (ce->index);
+
+      if (TREE_CODE (ce_index) == INTEGER_CST)
+       {
          /* A C99 designator is OK if it matches the current index.  */
-         if (TREE_INT_CST_LOW (ce->index) == index)
+         if (TREE_INT_CST_LOW (ce_index) == index)
            return true;

Hmm, it occurs to me that we probably want to replace ce->index with the 
constant value for the benefit of varasm.  I'm surprised that the 
testcase passes without doing that.

Jason