Hi,
today I noticed that I still have assigned this rather simple diagnostic
issue, where LAMBDA_EXPR is unhandled by our pretty printing code. I
suppose we can make at least some progress for 4.8.0. Is the below goo
enough for now?
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//////////////////////
/cp
2013-03-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/51412
* cxx-pretty-print.c (pp_cxx_expression): Handle LAMBDA_EXPR.
* error.c (dump_expr): Likewise.
/testsuite
2013-03-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/51412
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-err3.C: New.
Index: cp/cxx-pretty-print.c
===================================================================
--- cp/cxx-pretty-print.c (revision 196540)
+++ cp/cxx-pretty-print.c (working copy)
@@ -1162,6 +1162,10 @@ pp_cxx_expression (cxx_pretty_printer *pp, tree t)
}
}
break;
+
+ case LAMBDA_EXPR:
+ pp_cxx_ws_string (pp, "<lambda>");
+ break;
default:
pp_c_expression (pp_c_base (pp), t);
Index: cp/error.c
===================================================================
--- cp/error.c (revision 196540)
+++ cp/error.c (working copy)
@@ -2494,6 +2494,10 @@ dump_expr (tree t, int flags)
dump_expr (resolve_virtual_fun_from_obj_type_ref (t), flags);
break;
+ case LAMBDA_EXPR:
+ pp_string (cxx_pp, M_("<lambda>"));
+ break;
+
/* This list is incomplete, but should suffice for now.
It is very important that `sorry' does not call
`report_error_function'. That could cause an infinite loop. */
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-err3.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-err3.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-err3.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/51412
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+void foo(int);
+
+template<int> void bar()
+{
+ foo([]{}...); // { dg-error "<lambda>" }
+ foo([]{}=0 ...); // { dg-error "<lambda>" }
+}