Is it OK for wwdocs?
Index: gcc-4.8/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.8/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -r1.96 changes.html
--- gcc-4.8/changes.html 12 Feb 2013 16:33:58 -0000 1.96
+++ gcc-4.8/changes.html 13 Feb 2013 08:24:53 -0000
@@ -529,6 +529,10 @@
information.
</li>
<li> Windows MinGW-w64 targets (<code>*-w64-mingw*</code>) require at
least r5437 from the Mingw-w64 trunk. </li>
+ <li>Support for new AMD family 15h processors (Steamroller core) is now
available
+ through <code>-march=bdver3</code> and <code>-mtune=bdver3</code>
options.</li>
+ <li>Support for new AMD family 16h processors (Jaguar core) is now
available
+ through <code>-march=btver2</code> and <code>-mtune=btver2</code>
options.</li>
</ul>
<h3 id="frv">FRV</h3>
-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Morin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:38 PM
To: Richard Biener
Cc: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh; [email protected]; ubizjak at gmail dot
com ([email protected]); [email protected]
Subject: Re: [patch][wwwdocs] gcc 4.8 changes - AMD new cores
Le 13/02/2013 14:00, Richard Biener a écrit :
> Of course not. Next they'll add blver ...
Sorry
