On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Georg-Johann Lay <g...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> Please consider this as a reminder to review the patch posted at
>> following link:-
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00765.html
> 
> What is this good for?
> 
> Why are you changing the semantics of an existing, global constraint?

Don't worry, we reject this patch; it is a bad idea.  X does in fact mean, 
place no constraints on it.  If a port wants something between X and r, then 
the port will define their own letter and use it.

Reply via email to