On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > >That's true. Perhaps a warning message stating that --with-gc is now > >ignored? Or would you prefer a straight out error? > > I don't think we ever cared for this. > > Thus, the patch is ok if no other rm objects within a day.
I'm fine with it as is too.
Jakub
