Hello!

Attached fairly mechanical patch adds missing memory model argument
masks when comparing comparing with various MEMMODEL_* types. Please
note that we can modify the memory model with target flags, IX86_HLE_*
in case of x86.

Also, please note that this patch doesn't touch tsan.c.

2013-01-15  Uros Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>

        * emit-rtl.c (need_atomic_barrier_p): Mask memory model argument
        with MEMMODEL_MASK before comparing with MEMMODEL_* memory types.
        * optabs.c (maybe_emit_sync_lock_test_and_set): Ditto.
        (expand_mem_thread_fence): Ditto.
        (expand_mem_signal_fence): Ditto.
        (expand_atomic_load): Ditto.
        (expand_atomic_store): Ditto.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.

OK for mainline?

Uros.
Index: emit-rtl.c
===================================================================
--- emit-rtl.c  (revision 195152)
+++ emit-rtl.c  (working copy)
@@ -6014,7 +6014,7 @@ insn_file (const_rtx insn)
 bool
 need_atomic_barrier_p (enum memmodel model, bool pre)
 {
-  switch (model)
+  switch (model & MEMMODEL_MASK)
     {
     case MEMMODEL_RELAXED:
     case MEMMODEL_CONSUME:
Index: optabs.c
===================================================================
--- optabs.c    (revision 195152)
+++ optabs.c    (working copy)
@@ -7008,9 +7008,9 @@ maybe_emit_sync_lock_test_and_set (rtx target, rtx
      exists, and the memory model is stronger than acquire, add a release 
      barrier before the instruction.  */
 
-  if (model == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST
-      || model == MEMMODEL_RELEASE
-      || model == MEMMODEL_ACQ_REL)
+  if ((model & MEMMODEL_MASK) == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST
+      || (model & MEMMODEL_MASK) == MEMMODEL_RELEASE
+      || (model & MEMMODEL_MASK) == MEMMODEL_ACQ_REL)
     expand_mem_thread_fence (model);
 
   if (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing)
@@ -7388,7 +7388,7 @@ expand_mem_thread_fence (enum memmodel model)
 {
   if (HAVE_mem_thread_fence)
     emit_insn (gen_mem_thread_fence (GEN_INT (model)));
-  else if (model != MEMMODEL_RELAXED)
+  else if ((model & MEMMODEL_MASK) != MEMMODEL_RELAXED)
     {
       if (HAVE_memory_barrier)
        emit_insn (gen_memory_barrier ());
@@ -7412,7 +7412,7 @@ expand_mem_signal_fence (enum memmodel model)
 {
   if (HAVE_mem_signal_fence)
     emit_insn (gen_mem_signal_fence (GEN_INT (model)));
-  else if (model != MEMMODEL_RELAXED)
+  else if ((model & MEMMODEL_MASK) != MEMMODEL_RELAXED)
     {
       /* By default targets are coherent between a thread and the signal
         handler running on the same thread.  Thus this really becomes a
@@ -7467,7 +7467,7 @@ expand_atomic_load (rtx target, rtx mem, enum memm
     target = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
 
   /* For SEQ_CST, emit a barrier before the load.  */
-  if (model == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST)
+  if ((model & MEMMODEL_MASK) == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST)
     expand_mem_thread_fence (model);
 
   emit_move_insn (target, mem);
@@ -7513,7 +7513,7 @@ expand_atomic_store (rtx mem, rtx val, enum memmod
          if (maybe_expand_insn (icode, 2, ops))
            {
              /* lock_release is only a release barrier.  */
-             if (model == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST)
+             if ((model & MEMMODEL_MASK) == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST)
                expand_mem_thread_fence (model);
              return const0_rtx;
            }
@@ -7540,7 +7540,7 @@ expand_atomic_store (rtx mem, rtx val, enum memmod
   emit_move_insn (mem, val);
 
   /* For SEQ_CST, also emit a barrier after the store.  */
-  if (model == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST)
+  if ((model & MEMMODEL_MASK) == MEMMODEL_SEQ_CST)
     expand_mem_thread_fence (model);
 
   return const0_rtx;

Reply via email to