On 01/12/13 22:02, Mikael Morin wrote:
Le 08/01/2013 22:32, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
On 12/28/12 21:49, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hello all,
is there a default directive that is assumed when the testsuite is run?
Running an "fgrep -L" on the fortran testsuite, I found several files
that are missing either dg-do compile or run.
I also found a funny typo in gomp/appendix-a/a.11.2.f90
! { do-do compile }
find gfortran.dg -name "*.[fF]90" -o -name "*.[fF]" | \
xargs fgrep -w -L 'dg-do' | \
xargs head -1 -v
and manual inspection of the resulting output results in:
- Typos
[...]
- Possibly missing { dg-do run }
[...]
Mind sending patch and changelog to @gcc-patches ?
Here we go. No failures, but additional passes because of the dg-do
run's. Somebody please take care of it?
Harald
2013-01-13 Harald Anlauf <anl...@gmx.de>
* gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90: Add dg-do run.
* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_4.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/minloc_3.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/module_double_reuse.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/mvbits_1.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/oldstyle_1.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/pr20163-2.f: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/save_1.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/scan_1.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/select_char_1.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/shape_4.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/coarray_29_2.f90: Fix dg-do directive.
* gfortran.dg/function_optimize_10.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.11.2.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/used_types_17.f90: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/used_types_18.f90: Likewise.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/oldstyle_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/oldstyle_1.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/oldstyle_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
integer i, j /1/, g/2/, h ! { dg-warning "" "" }
integer k, l(3) /2*2,1/ ! { dg-warning "" "" }
real pi /3.1416/, e ! { dg-warning "" "" }
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/scan_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/scan_1.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/scan_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
program b
integer w
character(len=2) s, t
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
program aint_anint_1
implicit none
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.11.2.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.11.2.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/appendix-a/a.11.2.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { do-do compile }
+! { dg-do compile }
SUBROUTINE A11_2(AA, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, N)
INTEGER N
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_4.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_4.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_check_4.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
subroutine foo(n,x)
implicit none
integer, intent(in) :: n
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/save_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/save_1.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/save_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
! { dg-options "-O2 -fno-automatic" }
subroutine foo (b)
logical b
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_29_2.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_29_2.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_29_2.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg-compile }
+! { dg-do compile }
! { dg-options "-fcoarray=single" }
! Requires that coarray_29.f90 has been compiled before
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr20163-2.f
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr20163-2.f (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr20163-2.f (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
open(10,status="foo",err=100) ! { dg-warning "STATUS specifier in OPEN statement .* has invalid value" }
call abort
100 continue
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/minloc_3.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/minloc_3.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/minloc_3.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
real :: a(30), m
real, allocatable :: c(:)
integer :: e(30), n, ia(1)
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/used_types_18.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/used_types_18.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/used_types_18.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg do-compile }
+! { dg-do compile }
! { dg-options "-std=f2003" }
!
! Fortran 2003 allowes TYPE without components
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_char_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_char_1.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/select_char_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
integer function char_select (s)
character(len=*), intent(in) :: s
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/minlocval_3.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
real :: a(30), b(10, 10), m
real, allocatable :: c(:), d(:, :)
integer :: e(30), f(10, 10), n
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/function_optimize_10.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/function_optimize_10.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/function_optimize_10.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { do-do run }
+! { dg-do run }
! PR 51858 - this used to generate wrong code.
! Original test case by Don Simons.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_10.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
character(len=800) :: cwd
integer :: unit
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/module_double_reuse.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/module_double_reuse.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/module_double_reuse.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
! Test of fix for PR18878
!
! Based on example in PR by Steve Kargl
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/mvbits_1.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/mvbits_1.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/mvbits_1.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
! PR 25577
! MVBITS didn't work correctly for integer types wider than a C int
! The testcase is based on the one Dale Ranta posted in the bug report
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_4.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_4.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/shape_4.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+! { dg-do run }
! PR 35001 - we need to return 0 for the shapes of
! negative extents. Test case adapted from Tobias Burnus.
program main
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/used_types_17.f90
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/used_types_17.f90 (revision 195136)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/used_types_17.f90 (working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg do-compile }
+! { dg-do compile }
! Tests the fix for PR31630, in which the association of the argument
! of 'cmp' did not work.
!
