On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I wonder what is the point of using %qs with a fixed string, and ' should be
> probably replaced by %< and %>, so perhaps
>               "argument to %<-O%> should be a non-negative integer, "
>               "%<s%>, %<g%> or %<fast%>");

So, like this?

2013-01-04  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        * opts.c (default_options_optimization): Clarify error message.

--- gcc/opts.c.mp       2013-01-04 02:48:33.116785922 +0100
+++ gcc/opts.c  2013-01-04 12:00:15.983233160 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 /* Command line option handling.
    Copyright (C) 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011,
-   2012
-
+   2012, 2013
    Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    Contributed by Neil Booth.
 
@@ -542,9 +541,8 @@ default_options_optimization (struct gcc
            {
              const int optimize_val = integral_argument (opt->arg);
              if (optimize_val == -1)
-               error_at (loc,
-                         "argument to %qs should be a non-negative integer",
-                         "-O");
+               error_at (loc, "argument to %<-O%> should be a non-negative "
+                              "integer, %<g%>, %<s%> or %<fast%>");
              else
                {
                  opts->x_optimize = optimize_val;

        Marek

Reply via email to