> That doesn't make much sense. What do the lines around this look like?
I am currently bootstrapping r194675 with revision 194665 reverted.
The diff between gcc/auto-host.h with(-)/without(+) r194665 reverted
and --enable-checking=release for (+) looks like:
--- ../build_w/gcc/auto-host.h 2012-12-21 20:16:59.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/auto-host.h 2012-12-21 20:54:49.000000000 +0100
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
/* Define if you want more run-time sanity checks. This one gets a grab bag of
miscellaneous but relatively cheap checks. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
-#define ENABLE_CHECKING 1
+/* #undef ENABLE_CHECKING */
#endif
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
/* Define if you want the garbage collector to do object poisoning and other
memory allocation checks. This is quite expensive. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
-#define ENABLE_GC_CHECKING 1
+/* #undef ENABLE_GC_CHECKING */
#endif
...
/* Define to 1 if we found a declaration for 'strsignal', otherwise define to
0. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
-#define HAVE_DECL_STRSIGNAL 1
+#define HAVE_DECL_STRSIGNAL 0
#endif
...
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@
/* Define to `long' if <sys/resource.h> doesn't define. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
-/* #undef rlim_t */
+#define rlim_t long
#endif
I see
#define HAVE_STRSIGNAL 1
in both files.
Dominique
