On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> Could you please take a look at the attached patch that implements
> the target libc_has_function hook? I didn't change so far the default presence
> of c99, but rather tried to preserve the current behaviour of
> TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS.
It looks like a plausible starting point, given the changed default,
coding style fixes (you're missing spaces before '('), documentation text
moved from tm.texi.in to target.def, removal of TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS
documentation, poisoning of TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS in system.h and moving
the Linux implementation of the hook from builtins.c to some
Linux-specific file since you can't assume OPTION_GLIBC or OPTION_BIONIC
are defined for other targets.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
