On 12/18/2012 02:52 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Argh. But why? Wouldn't that only apply to cases where the lock was > sometimes locked by one library and sometimes locked by a different > one?
If two copies of the library aren't looking at the same lock object, then the lock does no actual locking. The lock object(s) themselves are not part of the public interface of the libatomic library. r~
