2012/12/10 David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com>: > There has been no progress on this bug for over two months. I have > opened PR fortran/55636. This must be fixed before GCC 4.8 ships.
Thanks for pinging, David. I almost forgot about it ... Here is a re-diffed version of my previous patch. I'd be grateful for comments. In particular: Does it fix all the problems on AIX? (For more open questions, see below.) Cheers, Janus > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> unfortunately my previous patch regressed on the proc_ptr_result test >> cases (due to problems with implicit typing of symbols with leading >> underscores, which also were the reason for using a suffix instead of >> a prefix for proc-ptr results in the first place). So I have taken out >> the 'ppr' parts, leaving only Tobias' original cases and the OOP >> stuff, which at least should be regression-free now. >> >> There are some more double-underscore cases which one could also >> change into the new _F convention. Should I keep going in this >> direction, or should we rather restrict this to the "leading dot" >> cases for now? I guess this is a question of how much ABI breaking we >> are willing to take. Opinions? >> >> Cheers, >> Janus
mangling_v3.diff
Description: Binary data
