Am 07.12.2012 10:17, schrieb Jakub Jelinek:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:13:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Am 07.12.2012 06:05, schrieb Jason Merrill:
>>> It's perfectly OK to initialize a base class of abstract type; it's only an
>>> error to create a full object of such a type. So this patch moves the check
>>> from more generic initialization code out into a function that's definitely
>>> creating a new object.
>>>
>>> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.7.
>>
>> this doesn't build on the branch:
>>
>> ../gcc/cp/tree.c: In function 'build_aggr_init_expr':
>> ../gcc/cp/tree.c:399:1: error: parameter name omitted
>>
>> this fixes the bootstrap, currently running the testsuite.
>
> Please commit as obvious with appropriate ChangeLog entry.
>
>> --- cp/tree.c~ 2012-12-07 10:01:16.665415647 +0100
>> +++ cp/tree.c 2012-12-07 10:11:01.373410862 +0100
>> @@ -396,7 +396,8 @@
>> callable. */
>>
>> tree
>> -build_aggr_init_expr (tree type, tree init, tsubst_flags_t /*complain*/)
>> +build_aggr_init_expr (tree type, tree init,
>> + tsubst_flags_t complain ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
>> {
>> tree fn;
>> tree slot;
>
> Jakub
>
comitted.
Matthias
2012-12-07 Matthias Klose <[email protected]>
* tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Add parameter name, mark as unused.
