Hi! This patch removes a bogus assertion (that predates introduction of STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ (and STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_STMT before that) in 4.7). stmt might be not just STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT of orig_stmt, bt also could be anywhere in STMT_VINFO_PATTERN_DEF_SEQ of it. We don't vectorize this anyway for multiple reasons (e.g. orig_code is TRUNC_DIV_EXPR which isn't handled reduction code, and even the pattern recognized stmts include MULT_HIGHPART_EXPR which isn't handled either).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2012-11-27 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/55110 * tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_reduction): Don't assert that STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT of orig_stmt is stmt. * gcc.dg/pr55110.c: New test. --- gcc/tree-vect-loop.c.jj 2012-11-21 16:00:12.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/tree-vect-loop.c 2012-11-26 11:24:42.903995009 +0100 @@ -4624,7 +4624,6 @@ vectorizable_reduction (gimple stmt, gim if (orig_stmt) { orig_stmt_info = vinfo_for_stmt (orig_stmt); - gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_RELATED_STMT (orig_stmt_info) == stmt); gcc_assert (STMT_VINFO_IN_PATTERN_P (orig_stmt_info)); gcc_assert (!STMT_VINFO_IN_PATTERN_P (stmt_info)); } --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr55110.c.jj 2012-11-26 11:31:32.008587313 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr55110.c 2012-11-26 11:31:09.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +/* PR tree-optimization/55110 */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1 -ftree-vectorize" } */ + +int +foo (int x) +{ + int a, b; + for (b = 0; b < 8; b++) + for (a = 0; a < 2; a++) + x /= 3; + return x; +} Jakub