On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@bitrange.com> > wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Nov 2012, Diego Novillo wrote: >>> I have now committed all 25 parts of this patch as rev 193595. Please >>> CC me on any problems that you think may be related to this rewrite. >> >> That seems to have trigged some bug in gcc-4.4-era. See >> PR55381. There are a lot of suspicious warnings from vec.h. >> It smells a bit like a host gcc bug, but I'll have to find a >> newer version where it builds to confirm. (If so, "hopefully" >> it's as "simple" as upping the minimum host gcc version or >> blacklisting gcc-4.4.x.) > > Yeah, I got those warnings in my sparc and hppa builds, but they are > harmless. Strictly speaking offsetof cannot be applied to non-PODs. > The only thing that makes that class non-POD is the protected > attribute, but that does not alter the physical layout. So the > compiler is emitting a harmless warning (newer versions have > tightened the check to warn when you are using offsetof on a non-base > class).
Doesn't that mean that a non-GCC host compiler might fail to build 4.8 during stage1? Richard. > My cris-elf builds worked fine, but config-list.mk only builds stage > 1, it does not build libgfortran. Can you give me instructions on how > to build your target on my x86 workstation? > > > Thanks. Diego.
