Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> writes: > On 21/09/12 03:40, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> Re: >> >>> I think tree-ssa-loop-ivopts is simply >>> asking for the wrong thing, and needs to be changed. As I say, >>> Sandra had some fixes in this area. >> >> This patch: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00319.html >> >> Sadly, that patch has fallen off the bottom of my priority list (some >> legal wrangling halted all work on the Hexagon port that was the >> motivating example for it), and meanwhile it's become bit-rotten due to >> Bill Schmidt's work that touched on the ivopts code as well. If someone >> else would like to "adopt" this patch, please do! >> >> I agree that it is just plain dumb for ivopts to be trying to precompute >> address costs for modes that are not even valid. >> > > Zdenek, > > this patch prevents ivopts from passing VOIDmode to address_cost. > > The patch fixes a buildbreaker in newlib for mips16. I've confirmed that I can > do a full mips build with newlib with this patch.
Many (belated) thanks for doing this. It kept falling off my radar... Richard
