On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:01:56 -0800 > >> I am open to suggestions on how to avoid forking the two versions. >> If we fork, the original asan team will not be able to cope with two >> repositories. > > The maintainer of the sanitizer's job is to do the merging and resolve > the conflicts between the two trees. This is how every other similar > situation is handled.
I am new to the gcc community and may not know all the rules. But your nice words (lunacy, garbage, etc) are not helping us. As for the particular problem, I did not even see a patch (did I miss it? Sorry, I am just back from a long trip) I'd prefer to mention the ARCHs explicitly where possible, i.e. #if defined(__x86_64__) || definde (__sparc64__) instead of #if __WORDSIZE == 64 || ... --kcc > > What's happening here, frankly, is garbage. > > The current situation is unacceptable and HJ's fix should go into the > GCC tree right now. > > The current situation is preventing people from getting work done, and > unnecessarily consuming developer resources.
