2012/11/14 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>: [...] > Since we came to the conclusion that removing the overload for (double, > double) worked, let's just do that and be done with it. Then we have a few > months before the release to make sure that we aren't regressing, safe > enough for this legacy TR1 stuff, IMO.
Good, here is the patch then, bootstrapped and tested
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without regressions on a old tree.
I plan to perform an additional testing before committing anyway.
2012-11-14 Fabien Chêne <fab...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR c++/54537
* cp-tree.h: Check OVL_USED with OVERLOAD_CHECK.
* name-lookup.c (do_nonmember_using_decl): Make sure we have an
OVERLOAD before calling OVL_USED. Call diagnose_name_conflict
instead of issuing an error without mentioning the conflicting
declaration.
2012-11-14 Fabien Chêne <fab...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR c++/54537
* g++.dg/overload/using3.C: New.
* g++.dg/overload/using2.C: Adjust.
* g++.dg/lookup/using9.C: Likewise.
2012-11-14 Fabien Chêne <fab...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR c++/54537
* include/tr1/cmath: Remove pow(double,double) overload, remove a
duplicated comment about DR 550. Add a comment to explain the
issue.
* testsuite/tr1/8_c_compatibility/cmath/pow_cmath.cc: New.
--
Fabien
54537.patch
Description: Binary data
