Hi,
while analyzing c-ray I noticed two issues.  First is that I originally set 
number
of size/time entries to 32.  Once we reach this limit we conservatively account
everything as unconditional.  This limit is not met on relatively simple
testcases, like ray-sphere.  The reason is that aggregate tracking now adds a 
lot
of new conditionals on individual fields. While number of arguments hardly 
exceeds
5, the number of fields passed and used easilly. So there is need to increase
the bound.

While propagating info about non-constant parameters, we should also work in
reverse postorder rather than in random order, since we can propagate things 
down across SSA graph.

Bootstrapped/regtested & comitted.

Honza

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- ChangeLog   (revision 193284)
+++ ChangeLog   (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+2012-11-07  Jan Hubicka  <j...@suse.cz>
+
+       * ipa-inline-analysis.c (true_predicate, single_cond_predicate,
+       reset_inline_edge_summary): Fix
+       formatting.
+       (account_size_time): Bump up the limit on number of size/time entries to
+       256.
+       (estimate_function_body_sizes): Work in reverse postorder.
+
 2012-11-07  David S. Miller  <da...@davemloft.net>
 
        PR bootstrap/55211
Index: ipa-inline-analysis.c
===================================================================
--- ipa-inline-analysis.c       (revision 193284)
+++ ipa-inline-analysis.c       (working copy)
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static inline struct predicate
 true_predicate (void)
 {
   struct predicate p;
-  p.clause[0]=0;
+  p.clause[0] = 0;
   return p;
 }
 
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@ static inline struct predicate
 single_cond_predicate (int cond)
 {
   struct predicate p;
-  p.clause[0]=1 << cond;
-  p.clause[1]=0;
+  p.clause[0] = 1 << cond;
+  p.clause[1] = 0;
   return p;
 }
 
@@ -692,12 +692,14 @@ account_size_time (struct inline_summary
        found = true;
         break;
       }
-  if (i == 32)
+  if (i == 256)
     {
       i = 0;
       found = true;
       e = &VEC_index (size_time_entry, summary->entry, 0);
       gcc_assert (!e->predicate.clause[0]);
+      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+       fprintf (dump_file, "\t\tReached limit on number of entries, ignoring 
the predicate.");
     }
   if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS) && (time || size))
     {
@@ -970,7 +972,7 @@ reset_inline_edge_summary (struct cgraph
     {
       struct inline_edge_summary *es = inline_edge_summary (e);
 
-      es->call_stmt_size = es->call_stmt_time =0;
+      es->call_stmt_size = es->call_stmt_time = 0;
       if (es->predicate)
        pool_free (edge_predicate_pool, es->predicate);
       es->predicate = NULL;
@@ -2280,6 +2282,8 @@ estimate_function_body_sizes (struct cgr
   struct predicate bb_predicate;
   struct ipa_node_params *parms_info = NULL;
   VEC (predicate_t, heap) *nonconstant_names = NULL;
+  int nblocks, n;
+  int *order;
 
   info->conds = 0;
   info->entry = 0;
@@ -2312,8 +2316,12 @@ estimate_function_body_sizes (struct cgr
   gcc_assert (my_function && my_function->cfg);
   if (parms_info)
     compute_bb_predicates (node, parms_info, info);
-  FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, my_function)
+  gcc_assert (cfun == my_function);
+  order = XNEWVEC (int, n_basic_blocks);
+  nblocks = pre_and_rev_post_order_compute (NULL, order, false);
+  for (n = 0; n < nblocks; n++)
     {
+      bb = BASIC_BLOCK (order[n]);
       freq = compute_call_stmt_bb_frequency (node->symbol.decl, bb);
 
       /* TODO: Obviously predicates can be propagated down across CFG.  */
@@ -2486,6 +2494,7 @@ estimate_function_body_sizes (struct cgr
   time = (time + CGRAPH_FREQ_BASE / 2) / CGRAPH_FREQ_BASE;
   if (time > MAX_TIME)
     time = MAX_TIME;
+  free (order);
 
   if (!early && nonconstant_names)
     {

Reply via email to