On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31 October 2012 22:14, François Dumont wrote:Here is the patch I came to. I use the 'universal reference' like you propose but some tests started to fail because I think gcc called it instead of the move constructor.Ah of course. The defaulted copy/move constructors you added are the right solution for that.
Assuming you never copy a non-const lvalue or a const rvalue. The current use seems ok, I just wanted to mention that it is rather fragile.
-- Marc Glisse
