On 08/30/2012 11:45 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 29 August 2012 13:25, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >> On 08/28/2012 08:12 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> On 28 August 2012 18:27, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Does it actually produce a segfault? I suppose it might on some >>>>> platforms, but not all, so I'm not sure it's worth changing. >> >> Using this patch on my x86_64 Gentoo Linux Desktop with gcc-4.7.1 does >> segfault >> as expected - when I make sure the correct libstdc++ is used at runtime, >> having the '_S_empty_rep_storage' symbol in the .rodata section rather than >> .bss. > > If it works reliably on x86_64 then I think the patch is worth considering. > > I'm on holiday for a week, so maybe one of the other maintainers will > deal with it first.
Any chance to get this in for 4.8? Thank you! /haubi/
