> Ping.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Easwaran Raman <era...@google.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >  This patch fixes bugs introduced by my previous patch to propagate
> > profiles during switch expansion. Bootstrap and profiledbootstrap
> > successful on x86_64. Confirmed that it fixes the crashes reported in
> > PR middle-end/54957. OK for trunk?
> >
> > - Easwaran
> >
> > 2012-10-17   Easwaran Raman  <era...@google.com>
> >
> >         PR target/54938
> >         PR middle-end/54957
> >         * optabs.c (emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1): Add REG_BR_PROB note
> >         only if it doesn't already exist.
> >         * except.c (sjlj_emit_function_enter): Remove unused variable.
> >         * stmt.c (get_outgoing_edge_probs): Return 0 if BB is NULL.

Seems fine, but under what conditions you get NULL here?

Honza
> >         (emit_case_dispatch_table): Handle the case where STMT_BB is
> >         NULL.
> >         (expand_sjlj_dispatch_table): Pass BB containing before_case
> >         to emit_case_dispatch_table.
> >
> > Index: gcc/optabs.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/optabs.c (revision 192488)
> > +++ gcc/optabs.c (working copy)
> > @@ -4268,11 +4268,9 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, enum machine_m
> >        && profile_status != PROFILE_ABSENT
> >        && insn
> >        && JUMP_P (insn)
> > -      && any_condjump_p (insn))
> > -    {
> > -      gcc_assert (!find_reg_note (insn, REG_BR_PROB, 0));
> > -      add_reg_note (insn, REG_BR_PROB, GEN_INT (prob));
> > -    }
> > +      && any_condjump_p (insn)
> > +      && !find_reg_note (insn, REG_BR_PROB, 0))
> > +    add_reg_note (insn, REG_BR_PROB, GEN_INT (prob));
> >  }
> >
> >  /* Generate code to compare X with Y so that the condition codes are
> > Index: gcc/except.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/except.c (revision 192488)
> > +++ gcc/except.c (working copy)
> > @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ sjlj_emit_function_enter (rtx dispatch_label)
> >    if (dispatch_label)
> >      {
> >  #ifdef DONT_USE_BUILTIN_SETJMP
> > -      rtx x, last;
> > +      rtx x;
> >        x = emit_library_call_value (setjmp_libfunc, NULL_RTX, 
> > LCT_RETURNS_TWICE,
> >     TYPE_MODE (integer_type_node), 1,
> >     plus_constant (Pmode, XEXP (fc, 0),
> > Index: gcc/stmt.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/stmt.c (revision 192488)
> > +++ gcc/stmt.c (working copy)
> > @@ -1867,6 +1867,8 @@ get_outgoing_edge_probs (basic_block bb)
> >    edge e;
> >    edge_iterator ei;
> >    int prob_sum = 0;
> > +  if (!bb)
> > +    return 0;
> >    FOR_EACH_EDGE(e, ei, bb->succs)
> >      prob_sum += e->probability;
> >    return prob_sum;
> > @@ -1916,8 +1918,8 @@ emit_case_dispatch_table (tree index_expr, tree in
> >    rtx fallback_label = label_rtx (case_list->code_label);
> >    rtx table_label = gen_label_rtx ();
> >    bool has_gaps = false;
> > -  edge default_edge = EDGE_SUCC(stmt_bb, 0);
> > -  int default_prob = default_edge->probability;
> > +  edge default_edge = stmt_bb ? EDGE_SUCC(stmt_bb, 0) : NULL;
> > +  int default_prob = default_edge ? default_edge->probability : 0;
> >    int base = get_outgoing_edge_probs (stmt_bb);
> >    bool try_with_tablejump = false;
> >
> > @@ -1997,7 +1999,8 @@ emit_case_dispatch_table (tree index_expr, tree in
> >        default_prob = 0;
> >      }
> >
> > -  default_edge->probability = default_prob;
> > +  if (default_edge)
> > +    default_edge->probability = default_prob;
> >
> >    /* We have altered the probability of the default edge. So the 
> > probabilities
> >       of all other edges need to be adjusted so that it sums up to
> > @@ -2289,7 +2292,8 @@ expand_sjlj_dispatch_table (rtx dispatch_index,
> >
> >        emit_case_dispatch_table (index_expr, index_type,
> >   case_list, default_label,
> > - minval, maxval, range, NULL);
> > + minval, maxval, range,
> > +                                BLOCK_FOR_INSN (before_case));
> >        emit_label (default_label);
> >        free_alloc_pool (case_node_pool);
> >      }

Reply via email to