These two tests currently fail if using gold, in the first instance
because powerpc64 gold doesn't support mixing old dot-sym objects
with new objects, and in the second instance because gold doesn't have
a --no-toc-sort option. Both macros ought to be defined for gold.
Tested etc. OK to apply everywhere?
* configure.ac (HAVE_LD_NO_DOT_SYMS): Set if using gold.
(HAVE_LD_LARGE_TOC): Likewise.
* configure: Regenerate.
Index: gcc/configure.ac
===================================================================
--- gcc/configure.ac (revision 192236)
+++ gcc/configure.ac (working copy)
@@ -4379,7 +4379,9 @@
AC_CACHE_CHECK(linker support for omitting dot symbols,
gcc_cv_ld_no_dot_syms,
[gcc_cv_ld_no_dot_syms=no
- if test $in_tree_ld = yes ; then
+ if test x"$ld_is_gold" = xyes; then
+ gcc_cv_ld_no_dot_syms=yes
+ elif test $in_tree_ld = yes ; then
if test "$gcc_cv_gld_major_version" -eq 2 -a "$gcc_cv_gld_minor_version"
-ge 16 -o "$gcc_cv_gld_major_version" -gt 2; then
gcc_cv_ld_no_dot_syms=yes
fi
@@ -4416,7 +4418,9 @@
AC_CACHE_CHECK(linker large toc support,
gcc_cv_ld_large_toc,
[gcc_cv_ld_large_toc=no
- if test $in_tree_ld = yes ; then
+ if test x"$ld_is_gold" = xyes; then
+ gcc_cv_ld_large_toc=yes
+ elif test $in_tree_ld = yes ; then
if test "$gcc_cv_gld_major_version" -eq 2 -a "$gcc_cv_gld_minor_version"
-ge 21 -o "$gcc_cv_gld_major_version" -gt 2; then
gcc_cv_ld_large_toc=yes
fi
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
