On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 20:37 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote: > Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de> wrote: > > This adds the test case from the PR. > > Tested together with the patch posted here > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg01380.html > > > > OK? > > It would be better to make it a valid C program. I've checked > that the test case with the change below also ICEs on revision > 192446 for sh-linux and your another patch fixes it. OK with > that change. > > Regards, > kaz > -- > --- gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54925.c~ 2012-10-15 20:00:50.000000000 +0900 > +++ gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54925.c 2012-10-15 20:01:03.000000000 +0900 > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > /* PR target/54925 */ > extern int bar; > +extern void foo (int *); > static unsigned char * > nr_memcpy (unsigned char *, unsigned char *, unsigned short); > > @@ -16,9 +17,11 @@ baz (char *buf, unsigned short len) > static unsigned char * > nr_memcpy (unsigned char * to, unsigned char * from, unsigned short len) > { > + unsigned char *p = to; > while (len > 0) > { > len--; > *to++ = *from++; > } > + return p; > }
Thanks for checking it! Committed with the change as rev 192482. Cheers, Oleg
