On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Terry Guo wrote: > Hello Joseph, > > Please help to review this new Multilib feature. It intends to provide user
Your patch doesn't include documentation for fragments.texi (which needs to define the semantics without reference to the details of what gcc.c's internal datastructures for multilibs, as output by genmultilib, might look like). I am unconvinced that directly adding to the drivers' internal datastructures like this is a sensible interface for specifying multilib choice in target makefile fragments. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
