Oleg Endo <[email protected]> wrote: > This is the same patch I posted in the PR. It seems to fix the issue. > Tested on rev 192200 with > make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim > \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}" > > and no new failures. > OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
