On 27/09/12 01:02, Janis Johnson wrote:
Test gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c is known to fail for GNU/Linux targets, as described in PR54732. This patch adds an XFAIL.Tested on arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabi, checked in on trunk. Janis gcc-20120926-5 2012-09-26 Janis Johnson <jani...@codesourcery.com> * gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c: XFAIL for GNU/Linux. Index: gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c =================================================================== --- gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c (revision 191765) +++ gcc.target/arm/div64-unwinding.c (working copy) @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ /* Performing a 64-bit division should not pull in the unwinder. */ -/* { dg-do run } */ +/* The test is expected to fail for GNU/Linux; see PR54723. */ +/* { dg-do run { xfail *-*-linux* } } */ /* { dg-options "-O0" } */ #include <stdlib.h>
I don't like this. To me, XFAIL means "there's a bug here, but we're not too worried about it". The behaviour on linux targets is correct, so this test should either PASS or be skipped.
R.
