On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Lawrence Crowl <cr...@googlers.com> wrote: > >> So, Jan Hubicka requested and approved the current spelling. >> What now? > > I don't think we should hold this up. The names Jan requested seem > reasonable enough. We seem to be running in circles here.
I suppose I have your promise that we'll release with consistent names. Please allocate some work hours on your side for the renaming of cgraph_node and varpool_node for the case Honza doesn't get to it in time. I see all these patches with mixed feeling - it puts breaks on all developers because they need to learn the new interface which does not bring any immediate benefit. So I think _your_ development time would be better spent by fixing open bugs or by tackling some of the existing scalability issues in GCC (rather than quoting funny '0.001% faster with 99% confidence' stuff). Thanks, Richard. > > Diego.
