gentle ping...

On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:41 PM Shivam Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 at 3:14 PM, Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 2:41 AM Shivam Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Gentle ping!
>>
>> Note the general policy is to allow for 2 weeks rather than 1 week. as
>> mentioned on https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html .
>> This is because folks get busy, or take a vacation or something else comes 
>> up.
>> In my case a few other things came up to sit down and review the
>> patch. I hope to get to it soon.
>
>
> I see, I was assuming itis one week.
>
> No issues, this is not critical to merge…
> It can wait…
>
> Thanks
> Shivam
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrea
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shivam
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 9:37 AM Shivam Gupta <[email protected]> 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > At -O1, GCC lowers (~a & 1) == (~b & 1) into two different GIMPLE
>> > > forms depending on whether the boolean values come from a function
>> > > return boundary or an inline expression:
>> > >
>> > >   1. Via function return (e.g. inlined is_even), GCC preserves the
>> > >      eq/ne form because the function boundary hides the internal
>> > >      structure from the gimplifier:
>> > >        ((a&1)==0) == ((b&1)==0)   outer node is eq/ne
>> > >
>> > >   2. Via inline expression (directly written), GCC sees the full
>> > >      boolean expression tree at once and folds to bit_xor during
>> > >      gimplification:
>> > >        ((a&1)!=0) ^ ((b&1)==0)   outer node is bit_xor
>> > >
>> > > Add a generalized match.pd rule handling:
>> > >   1. ((x & c) == 0) OP ((y & c) == 0)
>> > >   2. ((x & c) != 0) OP ((y & c) == 0)
>> > >
>> > > for OP in { ==, !=, ^ } and pow2 masks.
>> > >
>> > > Fold these directly into the canonical xor-mask form:
>> > >   ((x ^ y) & c) == 0
>> > >   ((x ^ y) & c) != 0
>> > >
>> > > Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.
>> > >
>> > > Changes since v1:
>> > > * v4: Removed the ((x & c) == 0) OP (y & c) simplify rule and
>> > >       mark the corresponding test case as XFAIL.
>> > >
>> > > * v3: Collapse both previous simplify rules into one generalized
>> > >       matcher covering all combinations of outer {eq, ne, bit_xor}
>> > >       and inner {eq, ne} comparisons.
>> > >       Add missing mixed-polarity test cases.
>> > >
>> > > * v2: Generalize mask from integer_onep to integer_pow2p.
>> > >       Combine both patterns into single one.
>> > >       Split test into bool-eq-evenness.c, bool-eq-bitxor.c,
>> > >       bool-eq-pow2.c.
>> > >
>> > >         PR tree-optimization/112533
>> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
>> > >         * match.pd: Canonicalize boolean comparisons of masked pow2
>> > >         bits into xor-mask tests.
>> > >
>> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> > >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-bitxor.c: New test.
>> > >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-evenness.c: New test.
>> > >         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-pow2.c: New test.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Shivam Gupta <[email protected]>
>> > > ---
>> > >  gcc/match.pd                                  | 21 +++++
>> > >  .../gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-bitxor.c          | 42 +++++++++
>> > >  .../gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-evenness.c        | 43 +++++++++
>> > >  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-pow2.c  | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
>> > >  4 files changed, 195 insertions(+)
>> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-bitxor.c
>> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-evenness.c
>> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-pow2.c
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
>> > > index ff13a07ea94..228bab78428 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/match.pd
>> > > +++ b/gcc/match.pd
>> > > @@ -1464,6 +1464,27 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
>> > >    (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
>> > >      (bit_and @0 (bit_not (lshift { build_all_ones_cst (type); } @1)))))
>> > >
>> > > +/* PR112533: Canonicalize boolean comparisons of masked pow2 bits into
>> > > +   xor-mask tests.
>> > > +   ((x & c) == 0) == ((y & c) == 0) -> (((x ^ y) & c) == 0)
>> > > +   ((x & c) == 0) != ((y & c) == 0) -> (((x ^ y) & c) != 0)
>> > > +   and equivalent xor forms.  */
>> > > +(for masked_ocmp (eq ne bit_xor)
>> > > + (for icmp0 (eq eq ne ne)
>> > > +      icmp1 (eq ne eq ne)
>> > > +  (simplify
>> > > +   (masked_ocmp
>> > > +    (icmp0 (bit_and @0 integer_pow2p@1) integer_zerop@3)
>> > > +    (icmp1 (bit_and @2 @1) @3))
>> > > +   (if (types_match (@0, @2))
>> > > +    (with {
>> > > +      bool innersame
>> > > +        = (icmp0 == EQ_EXPR) == (icmp1 == EQ_EXPR);
>> > > +    }
>> > > +     (if (innersame == (masked_ocmp == EQ_EXPR))
>> > > +      (eq (bit_and (bit_xor @0 @2) @1) @3)
>> > > +      (ne (bit_and (bit_xor @0 @2) @1) @3)))))))
>> > > +
>> > >  (for bitop (bit_and bit_ior)
>> > >       cmp (eq ne)
>> > >   /* PR35691: Transform
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-bitxor.c 
>> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-bitxor.c
>> > > new file mode 100644
>> > > index 00000000000..bc263e80977
>> > > --- /dev/null
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-bitxor.c
>> > > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
>> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> > > +/* { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
>> > > +
>> > > +typedef unsigned int u32;
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +xor_ne_eq (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 != 0) ^ (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +xor_eq_eq (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) ^ (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +xor_eq_ne (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) ^ (t2 != 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +xor_ne_ne (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 != 0) ^ (t2 != 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +/* Verify all functions canonicalize to xor-mask tests.  */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "a_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\) \\^ 
>> > > b_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\)" 3 "optimized" } } */
>> > > +
>> > > +/* xor_eq_ne not optimized yet due to zero_one_valued_p 
>> > > canonicalization.  */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "& 1" 2 "optimized" { xfail *-*-* 
>> > > } } } */
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-evenness.c 
>> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-evenness.c
>> > > new file mode 100644
>> > > index 00000000000..75df70dc6a4
>> > > --- /dev/null
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-evenness.c
>> > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
>> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> > > +/* { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
>> > > +
>> > > +/* Verify the GIMPLE-level fix for PR112533. */
>> > > +
>> > > +typedef unsigned int u32;
>> > > +
>> > > +static _Bool
>> > > +is_even (u32 a)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  return a % 2 == 0;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +same_evenness (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  return is_even (a) == is_even (b);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +diff_evenness (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  return is_even (a) != is_even (b);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +same_evenness_cmp_zero (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) == (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +diff_evenness_cmp_zero (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) != (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +/* Verify all functions canonicalize to xor forms.  */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\\^" 4 "optimized" } } */
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-pow2.c 
>> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-pow2.c
>> > > new file mode 100644
>> > > index 00000000000..109c5f03610
>> > > --- /dev/null
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bool-eq-pow2.c
>> > > @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
>> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> > > +/* { dg-options "-O1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
>> > > +
>> > > +typedef unsigned int u32;
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +eq_eq_outer_eq_mask2 (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 2;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 2;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) == (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +eq_eq_outer_eq_mask4 (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 4;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 4;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) == (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +eq_eq_outer_ne (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) != (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +ne_eq_outer_eq (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 != 0) == (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +ne_eq_outer_ne (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 != 0) != (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +eq_ne_outer_eq (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) == (t2 != 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +eq_ne_outer_ne (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) != (t2 != 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +ne_ne_outer_eq (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 != 0) == (t2 != 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +ne_ne_outer_ne (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 1;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 1;
>> > > +  return (t1 != 0) != (t2 != 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +/* Non-power-of-2: should not be simplified.  */
>> > > +_Bool
>> > > +eq_eq_outer_eq_nonpow2 (u32 a, u32 b)
>> > > +{
>> > > +  u32 t1 = a & 3;
>> > > +  u32 t2 = b & 3;
>> > > +  return (t1 == 0) == (t2 == 0);
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +/* Verify power-of-2 masks are simplified, non-power-of-2 masks are 
>> > > not.  */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "a_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\) \\^ 
>> > > b_\[0-9\]+\\(D\\)" 9 "optimized" } } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "& 3" 2 "optimized" } } */
>> > > --
>> > > 2.34.1
>> > >

Reply via email to