Hi Zhijin Zeng I am OK to remove the `r`, it's not too late to change it yet, so could you go ahead to create a PR for that?
Hi Jakub: >> The important thing about mangling is compactness (and of course that >> different functions mangle differently), not clarity. >> A demangler (if it exists for it) can print whatever it wants to make things >> clear. > E.g. the x86 choice of x, y, Y, z, Z, b, c, d, e, while the Intel > xyYzZ letters could be considered at least a little bit descriptive (XMM > (SSE2), YMM1 (AVX1), YMM2 (AVX2), MIC, ZMM (AVX512)), b, c, d, e are > just consecutive letters (for the GNU SSE2, AVX1, AVX2 and AVX512F). > Nobody is using sse2, avx, avx2 etc. there instead. > If some future RISC-V comes with a different incompatible vector extension, > you can always just pick other letters, no need to reuse 1248. Thanks for the inputs, I guess we at least have uppercase letters (26), lowercase letters (26) and digits (10) to use
