Hi Ezra,

> On 9 Jul 2026, at 14:40, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: Ezra Sitorus <[email protected]>
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> * lib/target-supports.exp (exts): Add "sve2p1", "sve2p2",
>  "sve2p3" and "sme2p3"
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp 
> b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> index cab72c8a9e10..030d158b9050 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> @@ -12909,10 +12909,11 @@ proc 
> check_effective_target_aarch64_gas_has_dtprel_reloc { } {
> set exts {
>     "bf16" "cmpbr" "crc" "crypto" "dotprod" "f32mm" "f64mm" "faminmax"
>     "fp" "fp8" "fp8dot2" "fp8dot4" "fp8fma" "i8mm" "ls64" "lse" "lut"
> -    "sb" "simd" "sve-b16b16" "sve" "sve2" "sve-sm4" "sve-aes" "sve-bitperm"
> +    "sb" "simd" "sve-b16b16" "sve" "sve2" "sve2p1" "sve2p2" "sve2p3"

There already check_effective_target_aarch64_asm_sve2p1_ok and 
check_effective_target_aarch64_asm_sve2p2_ok routines below, so I don’t think 
you need to add sve2p1 and sve2p2 here.

Ok otherwise.
Thanks,
Kyrill

> +    "sve-sm4" "sve-aes" "sve-bitperm"
>     "sve-sha3" "f8f16mm" "f8f32mm" "sve-f16f32mm"
>     "sme-f8f16" "sme-f8f32"
> -    "sme-b16b16" "sme-f16f16" "sme-i16i64" "sme" "sme2" "sme2p1" "sme2p2"
> +    "sme-b16b16" "sme-f16f16" "sme-i16i64" "sme" "sme2" "sme2p1" "sme2p2" 
> "sme2p3"
>     "ssve-fp8dot2" "ssve-fp8dot4" "ssve-fp8fma" "sve-bfscale" "sme-lutv2"
>     "ssve-fexpa" "ssve-bitperm" "ssve-aes"
> }
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

Reply via email to