Add patterns to handle the case where we're checking if a bit is set and
setting it in case it's not.  Similar to the work done in PR64567 but in
this case the bit is a result of a 1 << val lshift:

(A & BIT) EQ 0 ? A | BIT : A , BIT = 1 << val => A | BIT
(A & BIT) NE 0 ? A : A | BIT , BIT = 1 << val => A | BIT

We're also adding cases where a full bitmask is tested, i.e.:

(A & MASK) EQ MASK ? A : A | MASK => A | MASK
(A & MASK) NE MASK ? A | MASK : A => A | MASK

Note that for these simplifications we're not limited to a bit/pow2
value like the zero comparisons, which don't work with multiple bits
because there's no guarantees to preserve the 'non-zero' cases. E.g.:
"(A & 0xF) == 0 ? A | 0xF : A" can't be simplified to just "A | 0xF"
because there's a whole range of A lower bits (1,2...E) that would be
turned to 0xF in the simplification - bits that would be preserved in
the original pattern. This is the same scenario discussed before in
PR64567.

Bootstrapped and regression tested in x86_64, aarch64 and riscv64.

        PR tree-optimization/124667

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * match.pd(`(A & BIT) EQ 0 ? A | BIT : A`): New
        pattern.
        (`(A & BIT) NE 0 ? A : A | BIT`): New pattern.
        (`(A & MASK) EQ MASK ? A : A | MASK`): New pattern.
        (`(A & MASK) NE MASK ? A | MASK : A`): New pattern.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr124667.c: New test.
---

Hi,

This is a follow-up of:

[PATCH v3] tree-ssa-phiopt.cc: add cond_removal_mispredict_memop [PR124667]

But now we're using match.pd instead of using cselim.  There's a
bitclear case that we're not covering here since match.pd isn't
able (yet) to deal with more than one stmt in the middle_bb from
phiopt.  As soon as we get to that point I'll either re-send this
patch or, in case this is already merged, send a follow-up.



 gcc/match.pd                             |  31 +++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr124667.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr124667.c

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index a7cec25dbad..a6580926ee3 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -6102,6 +6102,37 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
   (if (wi::to_wide (@2) == ~wi::to_wide (@1))
    @3))
 
+/* PR124667: (A & (1 << val)) == 0 ? A |= (1 << val) : A
+   Similar to PR64567 above but with the bit given
+   by an (1 << val) lshift.  Note that this shift pattern
+   guarantees that this is a single bit operation.  */
+(simplify
+ (cond
+  (eq (bit_and:c @0 (lshift@1 integer_onep @2)) integer_zerop)
+      (bit_ior:c@3 @0 @1) @0)
+ @3)
+
+/* PR124667: (A & (1 << val)) != 0 ? A : A |= (1 << val)
+   NE variant of the previous match.  */
+(simplify
+ (cond
+  (ne (bit_and:c @0 (lshift@1 integer_onep @2)) integer_zerop)
+      @0 (bit_ior:c@3 @0 @1))
+ @3)
+
+/* PR124667: a bitmask set simplification that is possible as
+   long as the whole bitmask is being checked:
+   (A & B) == B ?   A    : A |= B  => A | B
+   (A & B) != B ? A |= B :   A     => A | B.  */
+(simplify
+ (cond (eq (bit_and:c @0 @1) @1)
+       @0 (bit_ior:c@2 @0 @1))
+ @2)
+(simplify
+ (cond (ne (bit_and:c @0 @1) @1)
+       (bit_ior:c@2 @0 @1) @0)
+ @2)
+
 #if GIMPLE
 (match (nop_atomic_bit_test_and_p @0 @1 @4)
  (bit_and (convert?@4 (ATOMIC_FETCH_OR_XOR_N @2 INTEGER_CST@0 @3))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr124667.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr124667.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9bdbe05a00d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr124667.c
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/* { dg-additional-options -O2 } */
+/* { dg-additional-options -fdump-tree-optimized } */
+
+int bitset1 (int n, int bit)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bitshift = 1 << bit;
+
+  if ((arr[n] & bitshift) == 0)
+    arr[n] |= bitshift;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset1_alt (int n, int bit)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bitshift = 1 << bit;
+
+  arr[n] = (arr[n] & bitshift) != 0 ? arr[n] : arr[n] | bitshift;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset1b (int n, int bit)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bitshift = 1 << bit;
+
+  if ((bitshift & arr[n]) == 0)
+    arr[n] |= bitshift;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset1b_alt (int n, int bit)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bitshift = 1 << bit;
+
+  arr[n] = (bitshift & arr[n]) != 0 ? arr[n] : bitshift | arr[n];
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset2 (int n)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bits = 0xF;
+
+  if ((arr[n] & bits) != bits)
+    arr[n] |= bits;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset2_alt (int n)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bits = 0xF;
+
+  arr[n] = (arr[n] & bits) == bits ?  arr[n]: arr[n] | bits;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset2b (int n)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bits = 0xF;
+
+  if ((bits & arr[n]) != bits)
+    arr[n] |= bits;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+int bitset2b_alt (int n)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+  int bits = 0xF;
+
+  arr[n] = (bits & arr[n]) == bits ?  arr[n]: bits | arr[n];
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+/* A negative test to ensure we're not optimizing something
+   we shouldn't. */
+int bitset_nosimplify (int n)
+{
+  int arr[16];
+
+  int bits = 0xF;
+
+  /* We can't make the bit_ior unconditional here because the
+     cond matches for multiple values aside from '0xF' in
+     which the value wouldn't be touched, e.g. for arr[n] = 0x1
+     "arr[n] & bits" is also non-zero and the value wouldn't be
+     changed.  */
+  if ((arr[n] & bits) == 0)
+    arr[n] |= bits;
+
+  return arr[n];
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "goto" 2 optimized } } */
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to