On Tue, 2026-07-07 at 23:46 -0600, Jeffrey Law wrote: > > On 7/7/2026 11:39 AM, Sam James wrote: > > For the PR, we'd love something backportable though, and having a patch > > which was never on trunk isn't ideal, though it is quite targeted.. > I certainly realize the issues here with wanting something > backportable. But this may be one we just have to live with. >
What's the problem with committing & backport the hacky fix now and then, once the infra for the more ideal solution lands, revert the commit and re- do it on master? At least that would give m68k compiler users access to a recent GCC 15 and GCC 16 today. Best regards, Oleg Endo
