Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> a écrit:
> --- gcc/cp/call.c.jj 2012-09-27 12:45:49.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/call.c 2012-10-01 17:53:17.594609236 +0200
> @@ -557,7 +557,10 @@ null_ptr_cst_p (tree t)
> {
> /* Core issue 903 says only literal 0 is a null pointer constant. */
> if (cxx_dialect < cxx0x)
> - t = integral_constant_value (t);
> + {
> + t = integral_constant_value (t);
> + t = maybe_constant_value (t);
> + }
Just for my education, why couldn't maybe_constant_value just call
integral_constant_value, so that we just use maybe_constant_value here?
Even after reading the comments of these two functions, /having/ to use
them like this seems confusing to the casual reader in me.
--
Dodji
