Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:04:58PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote: >>> After some off-line discussion with Richard, attached is v2 of the patch. >>> >>> 2012-09-27 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> >>> >>> PR rtl-optimization/54457 >>> * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_subreg): >>> Simplify (subreg:SI (op:DI ((x:DI) (y:DI)), 0) >>> to (op:SI (subreg:SI (x:DI) 0) (subreg:SI (x:DI) 0)). >> >> Is that a good idea even for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets? > > I have bootstrapped and regtested [1] the patch on > alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu, a WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS target, and there > were no additional failures.
Thanks. Given Jakub's question/concern, I'd really prefer a third opinion rather than approving it myself, but... OK if no-one objects within 24hrs. Richard
