Re: [PATCH] c++: Fix taking address of conversion operator template instantiation [PR122383]

[Eczbek]

On 5/28/26 16:54, Patrick Palka wrote:
> Does this do the right thing if we have a non-template and template
> overload:
> 
>   strut A  {
>     operator int();
>     template<class T> operator T();
>   };

Sorry, I submitted this patch by mistake. The proper patch is here: 
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-May/717939.html
With it, this code compiles:

struct A {
  operator int() { return {}; };
  template<class T> operator T() { return {}; };
};

int main() {
  &A::operator int;
  &A::operator long;
}